Search for: "NO PARTY v. NO PARTY" Results 581 - 600 of 120,092
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2010, 3:31 am by sally
R (Veolia ES Nottinghamshire Ltd) v Nottinghamshire County Council (Shlomo Dowen and The Audit Commission for Local Authorities and the National Health Service for England, interested parties) [2010] WLR (D) 273 “The right of ‘persons interested’ under section 15(1) of the Audit Commission Act 1998 to inspect the accounts to be audited and all books, deeds, contracts, bills, vouchers and receipts relating to them did not stretch, on the facts, to examination of… [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 1:57 pm by Xandra Kramer
Finally, in view of the UKSC’s finding of non-infringement of Article 6 ECHR in Coventry v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 7:30 am by Jessica Smith
However, the courts have applied Ritchie to a variety of confidential records in possession of third parties, including government agencies and private parties. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- On the brink of oral argument before the Supreme Court on Tuesday, it may be helpful to reiterate (as do the parties) the arguments from Petitioner Farmer Bowman and Respondent Monsanto, Inc. in Bowman v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] unanimously Monday in Thompson v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 3:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
Some unsurprising data, but some noteworthy; among other things, tea party supporters are more conservative than the public on social issues, but not vastly so — 40% think Roe v. [read post]