Search for: "National By-products, Inc. v. the United States" Results 581 - 600 of 1,808
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2014, 8:43 am by WIMS
Appealed from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case Nos. 10-4135, 10-4329). [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
§99B-6(b)(4), which specifically requires consideration of “[t]he extent to which the labeling for a prescription . . . drug approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration conformed to any applicable government . . . standard that was in effect when the product left the control of its manufacturer. [read post]
2 May 2022, 2:12 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Emotional distress damages are not recoverable in a private action to enforce the disability discrimination and accommodation requirements of either the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehab Act”) or the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) according to the May 1, 2022 United States Supreme Court ruling in Cummings v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
Clayton County, GA (No. 17-1618) and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
”[8] The Louisiana expense attribution provisions outlined above are based on federal tax  provisions aimed at preventing United States taxpayers from claiming deductions for amounts incurred to generate income not included in federal taxable income by the United States.[9]  There are two Internal Revenue Code  (“Code”) provisions on which the Louisiana law is based: Section 265, which addresses the treatment of interest expense… [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
Mendez, Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:47 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
, which charged a conspiracy to smuggle Southeast Asian artifacts, including from Thailand and Cambodia, into the United States, beginning in 2004;United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 1:49 am
 With this background, consider the following decision of the Court of Appeal of British Columbia (BC) in  Equustek Solutions Inc. v Google Inc., 2015 BCCA 265, released on 15 June 2015. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:01 am
  Another witness was Ryan Nobrega, “vice president of products for Send Me, Inc., the parent company of Mbuzzy”. [read post]
  The District Court further found the claims in the instant case involved matters of national interest as the product line in question had national reach and distribution. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 2:41 pm
Navajo Nation Issue: Whether the Court's prior decision in United States v. [read post]