Search for: "OWENS v. STATE" Results 581 - 600 of 1,046
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2007, 9:50 am
Owen of the Capital Punishment Center at the University of Texas Law School, and, for the state, by Edward L. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:30 am by Dan Ernst
If that placement is correct, then Hughes visited Roberts before Roberts cast his vote in Tipaldo; before both Hughes and Roberts voted to invalidate the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933 in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:46 am by Lawrence Solum
If that placement is correct, then Hughes visited Roberts before Roberts cast his vote in Tipaldo; before both Hughes and Roberts voted to invalidate the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933 in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 10:58 am by Aaron Lindstrom
 In Protect Our Jobs v Board of State Canvassers, the Court of Appeals granted, in a divided, unpublished decision, a writ of mandamus directing that the proposal to be added to the ballot. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 7:39 am by Patricia Salkin
Etherton v City of Rainsville, 2015 WL 6123213 (ND Ala 10/19/2015)Filed under: Agricultural Uses, Current Caselaw, Non-Conforming Uses, Standing [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:15 am by AnnMarie McDonald
  The class’s own attorneys state: Apple denies all allegations in the Lawsuit and in the Owens Action, and has asserted many defenses. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 6:29 am by Adam Chandler
United States, which will be argued this morning. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:26 am by Jordan Brunner
Quinta Jurecic posted the Lawfare Podcast: Goldsmith v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 10:46 am by Susan Brenner
A number of other people were at the apartment, including [Black], who had gone to the apartment with John Owens. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 2:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
Oregon State Bar, joined by Judge John Owens and District Judge William Orrick: To practice law in Oregon, an attorney must be a member of the Oregon State Bar ("OSB"). [read post]
2 May 2010, 8:19 am by Moseley Collins
The rationale for requiring expert testimony in medical malpractice actions was succinctly stated by the court in Barton v. [read post]