Search for: "Oxley v. Oxley" Results 581 - 600 of 1,120
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2012, 7:11 am by Lindsay Griffiths
  Expansion of Protected Activity Under Sarbanes-Oxley Continues from Epstein Becker & Green: Using  Zinn v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 3:01 pm by Mark Litwak
Study on the impact of State Blue Sky laws on Regulation A offerings.TITLE V--PRIVATE COMPANY FLEXIBILITY AND GROWTHSec. 501. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 9:59 am by William Carleton
Any firm that goes public already has up to two years after its IPO to comply with certain Sarbanes-Oxley auditing requirements. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:26 pm
Compliance with the auditor attestation requirement of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act is not required for the period that a company remains an EGC. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 12:34 pm by James Hamilton
The emerging growth companies would still be required to comply with SEC-mandated quarterly and annual disclosures, but they would be exempted from the auditor attestation provisions of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for a longer transition period, up to five years, instead of the current transition period of two years. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:45 am by Laurent
V Expand the small public offering exemption The JOBS Act increase [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s March 26, 2012 issuance of its unanimous opinion in the Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:14 pm by David Zaring
Title V, Private Company Flexibility and Growth. [read post]