Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 581 - 600
of 4,551
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2022, 6:27 am
State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 11:15 am
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 5:28 pm
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 8:39 am
Zelman v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 5:01 am
” In United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 2:04 pm
This background brings us to the precise claims put forward by Congregation L'Dor Va-Dor. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:40 pm
., and Ethicon US, LLC (collectively, Ethicon) appeal an adverse judgment following a bench trial. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 7:39 am
“There is no precise formula for a substantial change in circumstances. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:08 am
In American Center for Law and Justice v. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 10:19 pm
Congress had spoken to the precise issue—whether HSS could vary rates among hospitals when it used Option 2 to set reimbursement rates—and said “No. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:30 pm
Dissent: The plaintiffs' claims are barred by Heck v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:31 am
In Graham v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 6:14 am
Without specifying precisely what standard applied to the equal protection challenge, the court found that the skirt requirement was not related to any of the goals the school claimed it supported. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 12:12 pm
I guess I wouldn't be surprised if courts didn't allow experts on the standard of care in a field to use the word "negligent" even while allowing them to say "in my opinion X didn't meet the standard of care," but it seems a little weird.Mier v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:15 am
(See paragraph 135 et seq of the ICJ’s 2015 Judgment in Croatia v Serbia.) [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 3:55 am
As the authors note, “[I]n terms of economic significance, this estimate implies that a one-standard-deviation reduction in the marginal tax convexity measure (3.12 percentage points) would increase the turnover propensity by 0.86 percentage points. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 11:07 am
The case — Morgan v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 5:01 am
It used a stringent form of constitutional review to strike down all of the content restrictions in the Florida bill, but a less demanding standard to uphold some of the transparency rules. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 12:57 pm
This standard was affirmed yet again four years later in June Medical Services LLC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
As a result, it may not be a precise measuring rod for assessing whether retail investors are receiving fully competitive prices. [read post]
