Search for: "Park v. Respondent" Results 581 - 600 of 2,474
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2023, 4:55 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Ctr., Ltd., 276 AD2d 629 [2d Dept 2000] [“Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting” respondent’s untimely buyout election]; and Sobol v Les Pieds Nickels, Inc., 262 AD2d 194 [1st Dept 1999] [“Agostini, owner of half the shares in the subject corporation, failed to exercise her right of election within the 90-day period . . . thus leaving the issue of whether to treat her election as timely within the motion court’s discretion. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 9:12 pm by Heather Douglas
He parked in the driveway and came around to her side of the car… he dragged her out of the car by her feet and shoved her into his parents’ house. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 5:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Since 2010, defendants represented Lindenwood and its managing company, Delkap Management (“Delkap”) (collectively “respondents”), in a proceeding before the SDHR against allegations by a disabled shareholder that respondents denied her request to keep a dog as a reasonable accommodation and retaliated against her by removing her parking privileges in violation of NY Executive Law§ 296 (Doc. 17). [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 2:37 pm by Jon Gelman
(Courtesy of the Rutgers School of Law - Newark))Title: CATRAMBONE V. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 10:05 am by Giles Peaker
Dell v 89 Holland Park (Management) Ltd (2022) UKUT 169 (LC) 89 Holland Park was the lessee owned freehold company. [read post]