Search for: "Parker v. Parker" Results 581 - 600 of 2,351
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2010, 3:51 am by Dave
The judgment of the PC was delivered by Sir Jonathan Parker and it will be of particular interest as it demonstrates the continuing importance of the Court of Appeal's excellent judgment in Gillett v Holt [2000] EWCA Civ 66 as well as raising (without deciding) the interesting issue of the remedy when section 116, LRA 2002 is in issue in relation to third party buyers after the estoppel has been established. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:51 am by Dave
The judgment of the PC was delivered by Sir Jonathan Parker and it will be of particular interest as it demonstrates the continuing importance of the Court of Appeal's excellent judgment in Gillett v Holt [2000] EWCA Civ 66 as well as raising (without deciding) the interesting issue of the remedy when section 116, LRA 2002 is in issue in relation to third party buyers after the estoppel has been established. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 11:19 am by Stephen Bilkis
95 N.Y.2d 368 740 N.E.2d 1075 718 N.Y.S.2d 1 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent-Appellant, v. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 9:58 am
Parker has written a great article concerning the role confidentiality agreements play in Massachusetts medical malpractice settlements. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 7:10 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This was made clear in a 2001, Texas Supreme Court case styled, Allstate Insurance Company v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 7:42 am by Amy Howe
But that’s exactly what happened in District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 7:42 pm by chucknewton
  Worse for the creditor was the fact that the Court found that the creditor should pay actual and punitive damages of $21,820.00.In James Bradley Collier v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
The NFIB blog argues that in Seila Law v. [read post]