Search for: "People v Burns" Results 581 - 600 of 1,741
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2014, 9:32 am
That was of course famously announced even as to flag burning in Texas v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 3:56 am by SHG
To burn it as medical waste. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 2:30 pm by Mark Graber
If elected officials wish to burn witches, surely they will be able to provide empirical evidence at least as good as the evidence for creation “science” or the evidence Justice Kennedy in Carhart v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 6:12 am by Clarence T.
It has been my experience that the crime of “drug paraphernalia” catches most people off guard. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:14 am by Lyle Denniston
   The state also contended that the Supreme Court had said explicitly in a 1966 decision (Burns v. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 3:46 am by SHG
But chances of that happening are slim to none, and the Marshal clearly couldn’t make them, and comity between justices makes one burning another unthinkable. [read post]
2 May 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Later, Chief Justice John Marshall also was burned in effigy after writing the famous opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm by Law Lady
Jan Hughes can proceed with her claim that Boston Scientific Corp. failed to properly warn her about the Hydro ThermAblator's burn risks, the 5th U.S. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
Indeed, Marcelline Burns, a primary researcher in the development of the SFSTs, has stated the initial laboratory studies have limited relevance to understanding the use and accuracy of the SFSTs twenty-five years later in field settings.4 Have the subsequent Colorado, Florida, and San Diego SFST field studies rectified the earlier problems? [read post]