Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,807
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2020, 5:15 am
In layman’s terms, pseudolaw is pure nonsense.AVI v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 5:46 am
(Indeed, in Brown v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 4:18 am
Austin's employer was a non-subscriber.And the court also upheld the lower court's ruling in Seabright Insurance Co. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 3:09 pm
We consider that the Minister should be required to explain why the costs of resisting further litigation in the case of Kay v United Kingdom on this repeat issue are justified… We are concerned that the issue of respect for people's homes in summary possession cases remains unresolved, despite numerous decisions of the House of Lords and the European Court of Human Rights. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 3:09 pm
We consider that the Minister should be required to explain why the costs of resisting further litigation in the case of Kay v United Kingdom on this repeat issue are justified… We are concerned that the issue of respect for people's homes in summary possession cases remains unresolved, despite numerous decisions of the House of Lords and the European Court of Human Rights. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
In this vein it cited Lord Mance, who said in Laporte v Chief Constable of Gloucestershire Constabulary [2007] 2 AC 105: The requirement of imminence is relatively clear-cut and appropriately identifies the common law power (or duty) of any citizen including the police to take preventive action as a power of last resort catering for situations about to descend into violence. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:17 am
The second is that the names of the people whose cases are being decided, and others involved in the hearing, should be public knowledge. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:24 am
One of the hallmarks of totalitarian regimes is their insistence on controlling people’s thoughts as well as their behaviour. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:00 am
Following changes to social distancing provisions in Wales, it was legal for only 50 fans to attended a Welsh rugby match outside, but 140 people watched it indoors from the clubhouse on Boxing Day. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:10 pm
In the recent case of London Borough of Hillingdon v Neary [2011] EWHC 413 (COP) the issue of media access to Court of Protection proceedings arose for determination. [read post]
4 May 2022, 1:06 pm
R (Elkundi) v Birmingham and R (Imam) v Croydon (2022) EWCA Civ 601 (not on Bailii yet. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 11:36 am
Woodruff describes the Lord as having asked the Saints the following question:Which is the wisest course for the Latter-day Saints to pursue—to continue to attempt to practice plural marriage, with the laws of the nation against it and the opposition of sixty millions of people, and at the cost of the confiscation and loss of all the Temples, and the stopping of all the ordinances therein, . . . and the imprisonment of the First Presidency and Twelve and… [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:52 am
As Eady J put the matter in Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd: ‘Once the cat is out of the bag, and the intrusive publication has occurred, most people would think there was little to gain. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 10:59 am
The "E-meter" itself is said to cost anywhere from $900 for the Mark V up to $4,650 for the "Mark VII Super Quantum E-meter," which is apparently similar to the Mark V but with super quantum abilities. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 2:49 am
There have been a number of priority need cases in the Court of Appeal recently and Johnson v Solihull MBC, June 6, 2013, unreported [from a lawtel note] is another one.Mr Johnson was 37 years old. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 2:49 am
There have been a number of priority need cases in the Court of Appeal recently and Johnson v Solihull MBC, June 6, 2013, unreported [from a lawtel note] is another one.Mr Johnson was 37 years old. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 12:43 pm
Scott Lane is a plaintiff in the ACLU's case Lane v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
Blame old geezers like me | Mr Justice Arnold to become Lord Justice Arnold: congratulations! [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 9:11 am
Jurisdictional Boundaries of Prior Use within Britain: An analysis of the House of Lords’ judgments in Roebuck v Stirling (1774) and Brown v Annandale (1842)Barbara Henry (University of Hertfordshire)Commentator | Eva Hemmungs Wirtén (Linköping University, Sweden) Two cases, 60 years apart. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 11:32 pm
In Whitehouse v Gay News Limited [1979] AC 617, the matter was debated in the House of Lords. [read post]
