Search for: "People v Perry"
Results 581 - 600
of 882
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2011, 12:41 pm
And when it appears before them, whether it is styled Perry v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 8:35 am
The plaintiffs in Perry argued that Proposition 8 violated their fundamental right to marry, citing Loving v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 7:44 am
Even the plaintiffs’ expert in Perry v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 6:20 am
– Contrasting Lawrence v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 1:40 pm
The Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Perry v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 2:54 am
There's a tingle in the air as talk spreads that the Supreme Court will consider eyewitness identification when it hears Perry v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 10:39 am
And so, if it is a close call, here is one more reason for the Justices to grant cert. and vindicate Judge Vaughn Walker’s decision in Perry v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 6:38 am
Boren, 1976); unmarried individuals (Eisenstadt v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 6:44 am
Schwarzenegger (now Perry v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:37 am
The Supreme Court is not likely to impose same-sex marriage on the entire country, so Perry v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:44 am
. — The Supreme Court is not likely to impose same-sex marriage on the entire country, so Perry v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
(See Melone v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:34 am
Schwarzenegger (now Perry v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 6:35 am
Perry v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 8:45 am
. — After federal district court judge Vaughn Walker struck down California’s Proposition 8 as unconstitutional last August in Perry v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:41 am
For Judge Walker in Perry v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:32 pm
See TXI Operations, L.P. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 8:48 pm
His Justice Department's decision not to defend DOMA in court is based on the narrow ground that DOMA was motivated by "animus" towards gay people in violation of Romer v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:08 am
The question in Perry v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 11:50 am
Supreme Court handle the appeal in Perry v. [read post]
