Search for: "People v. Commissioners"
Results 581 - 600
of 2,348
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2020, 7:17 am
The Supreme Court held, in the Minor v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 5:13 am
In so finding, the Supreme Court rejected the application to the 1972 Order of the “Carltona principle”, so named after the Court of Appeal judgment in Carltona Ltd v Commissioners of Works [1943] 2 All ER 560. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 5:30 am
Tabatha Abu El-HajIn my last post, I suggested that McKesson v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 12:06 pm
DNA Sports Performance Lab, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 9:03 pm
One such difference is the number of people in charge of an agency. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:19 pm
The principle gets its name from Marcel v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [1992] Ch 225. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 12:21 am
Tax Commissioner and Kiryas Joel. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
FDA Commissioner Stephen M. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 2:40 pm
Nathaniel Sobel discussed the recent developments in the Trump v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 11:43 pm
In a development that should surprise nobody – least of all readers of this blog, where I have foreshadowed it twice – on 20 July 2020 the Commissioner of Patents filed an application for leave to appeal the decision in Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Limited v Commissioner of Patents [2020] FCA 778 to a Full Bench of the Federal Court of Australia. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
An overlap of e-signatures and Internet voting presented some legal challenges in Australia, leading to a decision I found problematic in a 2014 case comment on Getup Ltd v Elections Commissioner. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
Koppelman has made one, and I will join him – with just a few small differences – here.To assess Koppelman’s claims, I am going to return to Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am
From Edward Snowden to Luxembourg The case, Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 12:45 am
Simpson v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:06 pm
In Chapter 11 of the “Canadian Health Law Practice Manual,” Genetics and the Law, Amy Zarzeczny, Tracey M. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:15 pm
"The Supreme Court Rules Against Judicial Review of Expedited Removal (Lawfare Blog, July 2020) [text]- Refers to Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:35 pm
While inquiries into the Australian class actions market and the potential regulation of litigation funders are not new[v], the Federal Government in the past two months has sharply turned its attention on litigation funders by taking two significant steps: Litigation funding inquiry: On 13 May 2020, the Commonwealth Attorney-General announced an inquiry into litigation funding and the regulation of the class action industry. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:00 pm
“When violence breaks out at what was a peaceful protest, the people involved may or may not be the same ones. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
And so, even as a great many peoples worship the idea of the formless, they cannot help but provide manifestations of that formlessness as a bridge (and then ultimately as the thing itself). [read post]
