Search for: "People v. Cross" Results 581 - 600 of 6,092
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2015, 6:49 am
`Thus, the history and purpose of the Confrontation Clause show that it provides a right to confront human beings who can be brought into court and subjected to the `crucible of cross-examination. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
He noted that two people who had reacted to the protest made by the Appellants were charged and convicted for their actions. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 5:55 am by Brian Shiffrin
For example, the Court in People v Rawlins and People v Meekins (10 N.Y.3d 136 [2/19/2008]), considered how Crawford applies two categories of evidence: DNA reports and , fingerprints, comparisons. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 6:41 am by Darius Whelan
  This is an issue which arises in residential settings such as nursing homes, social care institutions and centres for people with disabilities. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 1:15 pm by NARF
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan (Michigan Health Care False Claims Act (HCFCA)) Waukegan Potawatomi Casino, LLC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
  Further, under cross-examination, the defendant “gave every impression of sincerity” whereas the claimant “gave an impression of braggadocio”. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 1:24 pm by Steven M. Gursten
” Personal injury lawyers and people injured in car accidents must meet this test under McCormick v. [read post]