Search for: "People v. Day (1992)"
Results 581 - 600
of 903
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2011, 2:33 am
There are a few constraints: You have to watch within 30 days of the recording. [read post]
10 Mar 2007, 11:12 pm
The operation of this provision was demonstrated in Zeran v America Online Inc, 129 F3d 327 (4th Cir., 1997). [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 9:52 pm
In a recent case this month, Barnes v Yahoo! [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 4:14 pm
GCIU Local 508 v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 10:21 am
Both sides emerged as both winners and losers (see PatLit here for a brief explanation and some idle speculation as to what the costs order might look like), and Class 99 waxed lyrical on the analogy between the design issues in this action and those in the 'pig fenders' case ( C & H Engineering v Klucznik [1992] FSR 421: as David Musker notes, "for pig read potato").So is there anything left for the IPKat? [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
Some cases considered at the court’s January 18 conference could squeeze in to the tail end of the April argument sitting by shaving a few days off the 30 days petitioners ordinarily would have to file reply briefs. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 11:21 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm
The next day, she went to the hospital, was diagnosed with a concussion, and was given intravenous medications for the pain. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:47 pm
There is already a crisis in people’s faith in democratic institutions. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
The lawsuit states that armed, unidentified federal officers dressed in camouflage confronted people protesting police brutality and detained them in unmarked vans. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:05 pm
Her judicial service began in 1992 when President George H.W. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 4:13 pm
Teaching academic, author of acclaimed defamation law textbooks, leading media law barrister in Australia and the UK, Dr Matt Collins QC packs a lot into his day … He agreed to spare some of his time to discuss defamation, privacy, celebrity, journalists’ sources, and free speech, just for starters GLJ: I wanted to start by asking you what you see as the major flaws in Australian defamation law, and how you might go about correcting them. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:24 am
History tells us how many people, among them countless Christian martyrs. were publicly executed in that infamous arena. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 7:41 am
One recent example is the case of Ash v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 9:09 am
Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 3:55 am
That case is Vanskike v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
In a 1992 Washington Post column, Hentoff described how activists would prevent his even leading discussions of the issue. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
” For it was on that day that the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Golan v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
It is a relic of the earliest days of penology, when slavery, branding, and other corporal punishments were commonplace. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March… [read post]
