Search for: "People v. Finely" Results 581 - 600 of 5,637
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2010, 10:36 am
This would not usurp the judicial function in any way; it would merely give judges instructions how to go about discovering the statute’s fine nuances. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 4:16 am by SHG
’s feelings were hurt when it was asserted that the audience at a rally in Germany at which he spoke, run by a group called Querdenken, weren’t just “very fine people,” but neo-Nazis. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 12:20 am by Tessa Shepperson
Secretary of Stage for the Environment, transport and regions v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:51 am by SHG
This isn’t exactly a new problem following the Court of Appeals holding in People v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 3:05 am by Brent Lorentz
 Others could argue that the absence of clear protection for certain method patents will disincentivize people to invent. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 3:05 am by Brent Lorentz
 Others could argue that the absence of clear protection for certain method patents will disincentivize people to invent. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:22 am by SHG
  Rather, the problem is that cops are locking up people for seatbelt violations, or unpaid fines (or for mistakenly thinking a fine is unpaid), or for offenses that state law says don't warrant an arrest, such as Virginia v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:04 pm by Florian Mueller
The Taiwan Fair Trade Commission's decision to impose a record fine of more than $700 million on Qualcomm and to demand a departure from some of Qualcomm's longstanding, problematic practices is really huge. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 2:37 pm by Michael Lumer
But once that sentence is served and the fines are paid, the offender should have an opportunity to restart his life. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 2:37 pm by Michael Lumer
But once that sentence is served and the fines are paid, the offender should have an opportunity to restart his life. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 5:23 am
Maybe you are familiar with that case (Thompson v. [read post]