Search for: "People v. Rodriguez" Results 581 - 600 of 674
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2009, 3:27 pm
It's strange enough when your husband takes everything out of the refrigerator and places the contents -- along with your family photographs -- on the floor surrounded by flowers as if for an altar or shrine. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:40 am
Rodriguez, when they held that the RIAA's default judgment applications are improper, and rejected them. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 12:29 pm
There's a lot, but you don't know what it is.Here's something you must tell, retell, and emphasize to the client -- STAY IN CONSTANT TOUCH with your appellate lawyer, make sure the administrative people and your appellate lawyer have an accurate address and phone number, and an email address (if not in the Brig).The Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces today (6 January 2009) published their decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Rodriguez, No. 06-20774 Convictions and sentences concerning participation in a single, broad conspiracy to transport many aliens to Houston are affirmed where: 1.) two appellants depended on the aliens' transportation to Houston for their full payment, though they did not intend to take any aliens to Houston themselves; and 2.) third appellant knew that many aliens would be transported by trailer well past Robstown. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 8:04 pm
Perhaps this case struck me harder than usual becuase my wife's a UNC fan (and graduate). [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 5:30 pm
Rodriguez (Strowmatt) - " Strowmatt asserts that the trial court erred in calculating his child support arrears. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 3:34 pm
Attorney Arturo Rodriguez, representing the state of Indiana, argued that Christian was on public property at the time of the arrest because the parking lot didn't belong to any particular person and was used by many people wishing to park their vehicles. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 7:44 am
The case is People v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 8:15 am
As sankyu correctly pointed out, the case I wrote about in the post - People v. [read post]