Search for: "People v. Sullivan" Results 581 - 600 of 961
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2022, 1:39 pm by Eugene Volokh
Sullivan—failed to carry the day: Six out of the nine Justices rejected such categorical immunity for statements in public debate (even for speech about public officials, and not just about people who are famous but who don't exercise government power). [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 7:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Regulation of non-press entities is also an important part of modern speech regulation, and I do think my topic is grounded in Sullivan, although not in Sullivan’s protection for the press as such.One important aspect of Sullivan, especially as later elaborated, is its bar on liability for derogatory but nonfactual speech. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:29 am
Just over two sides of the judgment were devoted to the discussion of the Grokster case (MGM v Grokster, 2005) - a case that was heavily relied upon by Viacom in their summary judgement - and its ‘progeny’ - Arista Records v Usenet (2009), Columbia Pictures v Fung (2009), and Arista Records v Lime Group LLC (2010). [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 1:58 pm by JudicialWatchWeb
The American people want the full truth about how and why these decisions were made. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:40 am by INFORRM
In the Courts On Monday 28 May 2012 the libel trial in the case of Wiseman v Sullivan began before Eady J (sitting without a jury). [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:04 pm
  Renata Hesse (Sullivan and Cromwell, and former DoJ) sought to reassure patent practitioners that anti-trust was not trying to take over. [read post]