Search for: "People v. Tooks"
Results 581 - 600
of 11,085
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2007, 9:18 am
The US Supreme Court heard oral argument in Medellin v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 4:28 am
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 7:33 pm
On the third season, one contestant made some cruel anti-Semitic remarks about a Jewish contestant which I, as a Jew, took personally. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 12:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
Constitution’s amendment rule, Article V, created high hurdles to constitutional change in an effort to entrench the exclusion of enslaved Africans from “we the people. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
In 1967, Harvard’s Robert Green McCloskey took a major step forward when he published a new edition of The Works of James Wilson (first published in 1804 by Wilson’s son, Bird Wilson), along with a lengthy introduction, bibliographical essay, and detailed index. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:25 am
King v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:11 am
" The Supreme Court held in American Airlines v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 3:13 pm
The comments are detailed and very helpful, adding a lot to my scanty commentary, so, for the housing lawyers amongst us, it is well worth reading their comments on my posts on Shala v Birmingham Aweys v Birmingham Omar v Birmingham and now Doherty v Birmingham (House of Lords bound, apparently) And to the CLP people, lovely to see you here, what took you so long? [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 10:33 am
Hobbs 7 Cal.4th 948), anonymous juries (People v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 10:33 am
Hobbs 7 Cal.4th 948), anonymous juries (People v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm
The second day of the trial in the case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC took place yesterday before Mr Justice Mann. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 9:45 am
See also Higgins v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:14 pm
The petitioners in that case, Elane Photography v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:38 am
As a result, and as was the case in Elliott v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 5:55 am
Since the 1st isn't doing anything, I will tell people to look at the 4th Circuit's decision in Cummings v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 7:03 am
People v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 12:59 pm
People v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 6:35 am
In Lucas v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 12:52 pm
When in response to the prosecutor's question, the main prosecution witness falsely testified that she had received no benefit for he testimony, the prosecutor did not correct this "misstatement" as required (see People v Novoa, 70 NY2d 490, 496-498; People v Hendricks, 2 AD3d 1450, 1451, lv denied 2 NY3d 762; People v Potter, 254 AD2d 831, 832).2. [read post]
