Search for: "Perez v. United States"
Results 581 - 600
of 713
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2010, 3:37 am
Here’s the 9th District’s recitation of the facts in State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 3:11 am
With the assistance of the Tewksbury K9 unit, police discovered a hidden compartment in the back floor of Perez's jeep. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 11:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 9:50 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:33 am
Those lawyers-Texas solo Dan Perez and Michigan-based Patrick Anderson, both of whom frequently work for Spangenberg and his patent companies-quickly hammered out the $4.2 million settlement. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 7:15 pm
Both questions are discussed in the Second Circuit case, United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:25 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 5:04 am
As the Supreme Court said in United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 6:50 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 5:51 am
Perez, 280 F.3d 318, 340 (3d Cir. 2002); United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 5:24 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 11:18 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 1:00 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice
Cocaine, Statements Not Suppressed; Car, Truck Subject to Search Warrant 'Automobile Exemption'
United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 9:29 pm
” Id. at 275 (quoting Perez v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 2:47 am
Judge Tallman doesn't (right), in United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 12:36 pm
United States Issue: Whether the holding in Roe v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 8:23 am
United States v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 10:02 am
., writes: In United States v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:02 am
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINAIn The Court of AppealsRobert Guinan, Appellant, v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 9:00 am
Canada US targets Canada over copyright in Special 301 Report (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (At Last... the 1709 Copyright Blog) (Michael Geist) Federal Court awards $250,000 to Microsoft over sale of two computers with unauthorised copies of Microsoft software: Microsoft v PC Village et al (Excess Copyright) CIRA: Complaint dismissed, costs awarded against… [read post]
