Search for: "Perry v. State of California" Results 581 - 600 of 786
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2010, 7:48 am by Nate Persily
Speaking of Texas, it is interesting to note that the Latino-majority district (Texas 23) that was redrawn following the Supreme Court's decision in LULAC v Perry has now switched back into Republican hands. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
Thus, Reinhardt suggested that the panel might ask the California Supreme Court to consider whether under state law anybody could stand in for the absent state officials to defend the measure. [read post]
The three-judge panel there held that, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision last summer in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 10:34 pm by Jeff Richardson
  On Wednesday, Apple and others filed a brief opposing the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:54 pm by John Elwood
§ 2254(d) by readily attributing error to the state court in violation of Woodford v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 5:20 am by Amy Howe
” Briefly: Although this month’s debt ceiling crisis was ultimately averted, Michael Kirkland of UPI discusses the Court’s 1935 decision in Perry v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 9:22 pm by Lawrence Solum
Perry, the Court overturned a district court’s decision to allow closed circuit televising of the trial challenging California’s ban on same-sex marriage. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am by John Elwood
State Bar of California and Lathrop v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am by Kedar Bhatia
California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 7:58 pm by cdw
The South Carolina Supreme Court in Angle Joe Perrie Vasquez  v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Prelesnik, No. 072522 In conviction for second degree murder, grant of writ of habeas corpus for ineffective counsel is affirmed where: 1) potential alibi witnesses coupled with an otherwise weak case rendered the failure to investigate the testimony sufficient to "undermine confidence" in the outcome of the jury verdict; and 2) the state appellate court's application of Strickland v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
Perry, is also pending, but that case does not involve DOMA directly; rather, it challenges a state constitutional amendment purporting to define marriage in California as being exclusively between one man and one woman. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
Perry, is also pending, but that case does not involve DOMA directly; rather, it challenges a state constitutional amendment purporting to define marriage in California as being exclusively between one man and one woman. [read post]