Search for: "Perry v. State of California" Results 581 - 600 of 786
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2011, 4:01 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The certified question issue has now been docketed at the California Supreme Court, under case number S189476, Perry v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 12:16 pm by David Lat
Schwarzenegger: Order Certifying a Question to the Supreme Court of California Perry v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:36 am by Charley
Schwarzenegger in the federal United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:09 am by Timothy P. Flynn
  The appellate judge suggested that perhaps the issue could be posed to the California Supreme Court for a determination as to whether California law would allow any entity to stand in as a legal “proxy” for the suit.Perry’s well-heeled lawyers stated in response to the suggestion that even if California law allowed a proxy-style legal fight, the proxy would be unable to demonstrate how they were harmed by lifting the ban against same-sex… [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:35 pm
By Mike Dorf In my latest FindLaw column and my post on Monday, I took issue with the framing of the relevance of Romer v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 9:22 pm by Lawrence Solum
Perry, the Court overturned a district court’s decision to allow closed circuit televising of the trial challenging California’s ban on same-sex marriage. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:22 pm
Evans and the California state court litigation over same-sex marriage, but I had another case in mind: Bush v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:57 pm by Mike
Perry states, "You change your mind like a girl changes clothes...you overthink [and] always speak cryptically [therefore] I should know that you're no good for me. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:53 am by Nabiha Syed
Briefly: At Appellate Daily, Michelle Olsen recaps Perry v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:42 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
I've tried, something like twelve times tonight, to load up and watch the oral arguments in Perry v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:51 pm by John Culhane
Earlier today, I live-blogged the argument to a Ninth Circuit panel in Perry v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
Thus, Reinhardt suggested that the panel might ask the California Supreme Court to consider whether under state law anybody could stand in for the absent state officials to defend the measure. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:48 am
Randy Smith, and Stephen Reinhardt -- the last of the 3 having denied the motion to disqualify himself filed by proponents of the ban, contained in the state's Constitution as a result of voters' approval of a 2008 ballot initiative, Proposition 8 (prior IntLawGrrls posts available here).The Ninth Circuit has decided to permit live dissemination of the arguments in the case, Perry v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:20 am by James Bickford
Office of Personnel Management and Perry v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:24 pm by Mary A. Fischer
” Within two weeks, Ted Olson had signed on to lead the federal challenge that became Perry v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:45 pm by Emily
On Monday, December 6, the Ninth Circuit will hear oral arguments in Perry v. [read post]