Search for: "Phillips v. Hand" Results 581 - 600 of 620
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
Their images should be treated with the same scorn as those depicting Chief Justice Roger Taney, the author of the execrable decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm by Graham Smith
Instead it grants broad powers mitigated by safeguards and by the day to day application of soft limits: necessity and proportionality.The philosophy of granting broad powers counterbalanced by safeguards and soft limits reflects a belief that, because the UK has a long tradition of respect for liberty, we can and should trust our authorities, suitably overseen, with powers that we would not wish to see in less scrupulous hands. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm by Graham Smith
 Limits on powers v safeguards The Act is underpinned by the assumption that breadth of powers can be counterbalanced by safeguards (independent prior approval, access restrictions, oversight) and soft limits on their exercise (necessity and proportionality). [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:40 am by Matthew Crow
In Freedom Bound, it is law that provides the means for instituting empire and its circumscriptions of legal and civic personality, from the beginnings of Spanish and English colonization of the Americas to Dred Scott v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 10:12 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
 In Pennsylvania, punitive damages may be awarded “when the plaintiff has established that the defendant has acted in an outrageous fashion due to either the defendant’s evil motive or his reckless indifference to the rights of others,” Phillips v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
This sense of principle is illustrated by Ronald Dworkin's example of the principle that no one should be allowed to profit from their own wrong, drawn from the case of Riggs v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
Eriq Gardner at THR, Esq. has the story, as does Ray Beckerman at Recording Industry v. the People. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 10:38 am
  Today, the Straus Institute in Malibu is hosting a conference to equip us to deal with the issues that arise in those negotiations.ASIAN CULTURES relationship essential business cards:  give with both hands; take with both hands; read or you will be considered disrespectful -- you are not interested in who this person is comfortable with uncertainty principal to principal negotiations:  negotiators need to be of… [read post]
It is arguably a necessary power in order to meet the contingencies that arise over time.In the leading American case, Jackson v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:42 pm
Programs and Initiatives: Networking, mentoring, retreats, and seminars on navigating law firm life as a working mother all help to create a more comfortable environment for women balancing their work and home lives. [34] For example, Nixon Peabody has instituted a formal mentoring program that requires that all young lawyers, regardless of gender, have one senior colleague to turn to. [35] Epstein Becker& Green, P.C. enjoys a 50% female attorney ratio, and 25% of its partners are women -… [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Sparing no modesty for a plan he personally designed with a handful of close advisors, Xi Jinping hailed BRI as the “project of the Century. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:09 am by Yosi Yahoudai
“As an Uber driver this is someone, they thought they had reason to trust,” said Harris County Assistant District Attorney Barbara Phillips. [read post]