Search for: "Phillips v. Phillips" Results 581 - 600 of 3,843
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm by Blog Editorial
From Monday 7 to Wednesday 9 March 2011, Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale, and Lords Mance and Collins will hear Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:05 am by Laura Sandwell
Starting on Tuesday 7 February 2012 is the two day hearing  in front of a panel of seven (Lady Kerr and Lords Phillips, Walker, Kerr, Brown, Dyson and Wilson) of R (KM) (by his mother and litigation friend JM) v Cambridgeshire County Council. [read post]
19 May 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Cal.) about this amicus brief from Paul Alan Levy (Public Citizen).and Phillip R. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am by Blog Editorial
On Tuesday 29 and Wednesday 30 March 2011, Lords Phillips, Walker, Mance, Collins and Clarke will hear NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 4:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  It is found in Delphi Healthcare PLLC v Petrella Phillips LLP   2018 NY Slip Op 01012  Decided on February 9, 2018  Appellate Division, Fourth Department. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 6:44 am by José Guillermo
v=pQnIg-vXIKY Especialmente la parte siguiente: "Cuando estoy entre tus brazos, siempre me pregunto yo, cuanto me debía el destino que contigo me pagó" [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 4:30 am by Howard Friedman
According to the Denver Post, the Colorado Civil Rights Commission on Friday affirmed the Initial Decision of an administrative law judge in Craig v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 9:30 am by Karen Tani
From our colleagues at Columbia Law School, we have the lineup for their Legal History Workshop:Sept. 27Kate Redburn: The Equal Right to Discriminate: Religious Liberty, Free Speech, and the Long Road to 303 Creative v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 9:17 am by Sandy
The Second Circuit has held that it is within the State's police power to require children to be vaccinated in order to attend public school and that such a requirement does not violate the First Amendment or other constitutional rights.Citing Supreme Court precedent, the Second Circuit held that the right to practice religion freely does not include liberty to expose the community or the child to communicable disease or the latter to illhealth or death.The Second Circuit further held that the… [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:29 pm by Jason Rantanen
By: Jason Rantanen Fujitsu Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 7:50 am
Last week in Matter of Phillips v Ramsey, 2007 NY Slip Op 06045, the Second Department held that a state trooper's personal copy of a police training manual does not constitute Brady material. [read post]