Search for: "Phillips v. Phillips" Results 581 - 600 of 4,221
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2020, 9:16 pm by Scott McKeown
”  But, this dispute may be a preview 2020 developments with the PTAB now aligned with the Phillips construction of the courts. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Circuit [Charles Gallmeyer, Jurist; Hemant Mehta; Northeastern Pennsylvania Freethought Society v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 2:10 pm by John Rubin
Appeal of district court’s denial of defendant’s motion to enter judgment on PJC was not properly before Court of Appeals State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 8:55 am by Florian Mueller
"That quote is also interesting with a view to the recently-filed Intel and Apple v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In [*2]addition, a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct, in itself, does not give rise to a private cause of action against an attorney or law firm (see Cohen v Kachroo, 115 AD3d 512, 513; DeStaso v Condon Resnick, LLP, 90 AD3d 809, 814; Kallman v Krupnick, 67 AD3d 1093, 1096; Weintraub v Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim, & Ballon, 172 AD2d 254, 254). [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, a plaintiff must plead the attorney’s intentional deceit damages caused by the deceit (see Doscher v Mannatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, 148 AD3d 523, 524 [1st Dept 2017]). [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
As Trump Moves to Bully Witnesses and Derail Impeachment, Democrats See Obstruction Anchorage Daily News – Phillip Rucker, Rachael Bade, and Roisalind Helderman (Washington Post) | Published: 11/1/2019 The centerpiece of House Democrats’ eventual impeachment charges is widely expected to be President Trump’s alleged abuse of power over Ukraine. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 9:22 am by Joel Goldstein
The Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 8:43 am by John Jascob
The order imposed monetary sanctions totaling $1.5 million, which included a civil monetary penalty of $500,000, and $1 million in restitution. The order also required Phillips Capital to provide reports to the CFTC on its remediation efforts.  An afternoon of emerging threats. [read post]