Search for: "Plante v. United States" Results 581 - 600 of 2,166
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2010, 7:49 am by Jason Rantanen
   * * * * The three appellants in this appeal, GPG, Trimone, and ELE, import ground fault circuit interrupters ("GFCIs") into the United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 7:13 am
It has plants in the United States, and one in Mexico. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:24 am by Anna Christensen
  The Plant Protection Act of 2000 (PPA) directs the Secretary of Agriculture (or his designee—in this case, the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)) to promulgate regulations to prevent the “introduction of plant pests into the United States or the dissemination of plant pests within the United States. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:40 am by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan at Marquette. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 2:14 pm
Let's imagine, for example, that the federal government has passed the following law: "The title to all marijuana located in the United States is hereby declared to be vested in the United States. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 10:45 am by Sarah Johnson Phillips
From my colleague, Andrew Moratzka: On June 7th, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued an opinion in Illinois Commerce Commission, et al., v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 11:34 am by Kristen E. Polovoy
Class action litigation over food product labels is rapidly emerging around the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 7:38 am by Erin Miller
Opinion below (4th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Amicus brief of Law Professors Amicus brief of New Jersey Public Advocate Amicus brief of the United States (grant) Supplemental brief of respondents No. 09-475, Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 1:43 pm by Dan Flynn
A tentative date of June 2017 has been set for the start of the jury trial in a South Dakota state court over the “pink slime” dispute known as BPI v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 12:28 am
These comments specifically stated that the Devils River Unit should be excluded because the benefits of doing so outweighed the benefits of inclusion. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
While many of these provisions are consistent with the laws of Bangladesh, several key provisions are drawn from either the law of the United States or norms included in a number of international treaties (only some of which have been ratified or incorporated into the laws of either the United and or Bangladesh). [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 6:21 am by Jack Goldsmith
   If the United States wants to take public action against Russia in response to the hack—and indeed, even if it wants (as the NYT puts it) “to publicly accuse the government of President Vladimir V. [read post]