Search for: "Power v. Holder"
Results 581 - 600
of 2,827
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
[Josh Blackman] The PROMESA Board Members Are Not "Officers of the United States." So What Are They?
10 Jun 2020, 11:31 am
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Recently, the Supreme Court decided Financial Oversight and Management Bd. for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 11:09 am
Much of this gold rush was spurned on by a May 2007 ruling in the case of Perfect 10 v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 2:19 pm
The Office also suggests the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Lenz v Universal Music was mistaken. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Gilbert v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:17 pm
§ 1512.2 Definitions.For the purposes of this part:(a) Bicycle means:(1) A two-wheeled vehicle having a rear drive wheel that is solely human-powered;(2) A two- or three-wheeled vehicle with fully operable pedals and an electric motor of less than 750 watts (1 h.p.), whose maximum speed on a paved level surface, when powered solely by such a motor while ridden by an operator who weighs 170 pounds, is less than 20 mph. [read post]
19 May 2020, 8:30 am
Changes to it can only change through the procedures laid out in Article V. [read post]
18 May 2020, 11:30 am
See American Legion v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 8:14 am
Together these elements produce a tendency toward the construction of stakeholder as censor, though without the powers of the holders of that office during the time of the Roman Republic (e.g., the magisterial Jaakko Suolahti (1963) "The Roman Censors: A Study on Social Structure. [read post]
15 May 2020, 4:30 am
Fund v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:26 pm
Yoo and LaCroix commented on how that executive order squares with a Supreme Court decision that shaped modern understanding of presidential power— Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:19 am
(HC 2109/20 Ben Meir v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:26 pm
In its 2012 decision, Mayo Collaborative Servs. v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 7:58 pm
[More unanticipated consequences from Republican National Committee v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:58 am
” That royalty is no pittance: In Hughes Aircraft v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 2:32 pm
Holder [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:13 pm
One of the powers the Act gave to the Supreme Court, writs of mandamus, was the subject of the famous Supreme Court case, Marbury v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
See Loretto v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 9:05 am
” Hovey v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 7:13 pm
” And in Veix v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 1:25 am
If the Court followed the interpretation of Article 8(2) as advanced by Constantin Film, it would upset “the balance that was struck by the EU legislature in such a way as to favour the interests of holders of intellectual property rights. [read post]
