Search for: "Price v. State Bar" Results 581 - 600 of 2,556
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
Of course, there is still that pesky little confusion test for Gucci, which in the Second Circuit is the Polaroid Crop v Polarad Elecs Corp (1961) test (see test here as applied to another famous shoe battle, Louboutin v YSL). [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, plaintiff's proposed amended complaint sufficiently states a claim for legal [*2]malpractice (Deitz v Kelleher & Flink, 232 AD2d 943 [1996]; see also Tenzer, Greenblatt, Fallon & Kaplan v Ellenberg, 199 AD2d 45 [1993]). [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 2:35 pm by admin
However, in an interesting decision handed down earlier today (Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 12:40 am
USANA Health Sciences, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 7:25 am by Bradley Wrightsel
The Ohio Supreme Court in its decision, Columbus Bar Assn. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 1:54 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 In the closing days of its September term, the Illinois Supreme Court agreed to take up Price v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 4:59 pm
Defenses to indefiniteness and inequitable conduct went nowhere, as did on-sale bar (§ 102(b)) based on a provisional priority date. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:50 pm by Bexis
 Have any other states used the presence of a learned intermediary selecting prescription medical products and making prescriptions as a reason for barring implied warranty cases? [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 8:59 am
Accordingly, it held that sovereign immunity barred the district’s suit. [read post]