Search for: "Price v. Superior Court" Results 581 - 600 of 1,080
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
  The Superior Court denied the claim for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, but the Court of Appeal reversed citing the analysis of exhaustion in CEQA exemption cases in Azusa Land Reclamation Co. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 4:20 pm by Peter Vodola
In this post is a description of the life settlements business, courtesy of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in its opinion in Greenwich Life Settlements, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 11:31 am by Hyland Hunt
The most significant case is Advanced Energy United, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 7:56 am by John Jascob
As noted above, the major exchanges have an interest in maintaining a status quo in which their proprietary data products are superior to the publicly-disseminated feeds. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 11:57 am by Eugene Volokh
Prior to removal, Doe secured an order from the New Hampshire Superior Court sealing the state court docket and all pleadings. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 10:59 am by Russell Jackson
The court went on to express serious doubts about the superiority requirement -- in particular noting how unmanageable plaintiff's class definition was. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
  Several lower court decisions had done so explicitly:  Overton v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 6:04 am by admin
(Misleading Advertising and Performance Claims) On August 19, 2013, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice issued its decision in the Chatr advertising case (Canada (Competition Bureau) v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:25 pm
That year it reversed the Supreme Court of Georgia in Jones v. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I think price fixing should be permanent, but not done by Wall Street. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  Pioneer manufacturers that have long since ceased making or selling a product end up saddled with liability that can only be recouped by raising the prices of other, unrelated pioneer products. [read post]