Search for: "Public Service Company v. Brown"
Results 581 - 600
of 751
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP… [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:51 pm
The Malaysian politician, Hadi Awang, has discontinued his libel action (see Lawtel [£]) against Clare Rewcastle Brown over a post in the “Sarawak Report”. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
As a result, the retroactivity provision did not become effective until August 1, 2008 —30 days after its publication in the final SMART guidelines along with the Attorney General’s response to related public comments. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:51 am
Scarlet that ISPs may not be asked to filter content to protect copyright, and its landmark decision in Google v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 4:08 pm
We had a post about these by Amber Melville-Brown. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:39 pm
The other two witnesses were Professor Dan Burk (UC Irvine) and Andrew Pincus (Mayer Brown, representing BSA). [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 1:15 pm
Until then I was working from Texas conducting legal research on the “innocent infringer defense” for Maverick Recording Company v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:12 am
Supreme Court's landmark school-desegregation decision of Brown v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 1:11 pm
Bonds in Bonds v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
Going green: why companies are offering environmentally responsible technologies. 19 Southeastern Envtl. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:00 pm
The minority opinion of Mister Justice Brown focusing on public policy would seem to be sounder.) [read post]
12 May 2023, 11:45 am
Conduits—like the telephone company—were on the other end of the spectrum, and could not be held liable for the speech of those who used their services. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
Defining WIPO’s role (Intellectual Property Watch) Introduction to patent monetisation resources for corporations and entrepreneurs (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Top PCT filing firms revealed (IAM) Commercialising innovation mini-series – interview with industrial designer Jim Richardson (IP Watchdog) Royalty triggers are fraught with litigation risk, so handle with care (Technology Transfer Tactics) The IP zone: a new concept for introducing needed information and efficiencies into… [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:58 am
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
For example, the draft Merger Guidelines anticipate that a company can use acquisitions to strengthen its overall position across multiple products or services and thereby frustrate competition from companies who do not offer a similar array of products or services.[5] Such a theory could apply to any large company that is expanding into a new product area through acquisition. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 7:58 am
Brown, 643 F. 2d 835 (1st Cir., 1981) and Weinberger V. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
It’s an experience that has helped shape my entire public service journey. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Hulu Reverses Policy, Will Use Cable Standards for Political Ads MSN – John Wagner and Michael Scherer (Washington Post) | Published: 7/27/2022 The streaming service Hulu said it will start accepting political ads with the same standards the company uses for its cable networks, opening the door for issue advertising on controversial topics after Democratic groups attacked the company for rejecting ads on abortion and guns. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 12:54 pm
Along with the ACLU, we challenged the law and won core protections for internet rights in a Supreme Court case, Reno v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:12 pm
The new law recognizes that certain non-compete and conflict-of-interest clauses violate Maryland’s public policy and are therefore null and void. [read post]
