Search for: "Queen v. Queen"
Results 581 - 600
of 4,482
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2020, 9:07 am
R. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
In The Queen v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Then, in a case of first impression, McKithen v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 4:00 am
[v] But, to contrary appearances, on February 27, 2020, the Law Society of Ontario (LSO) released its Priority Planning Committee’s Strategic Plan (LSO’s Treasurer (“President” in other provinces), Malcolm Mercer, being the Chair of the Committee). [read post]
28 May 2020, 7:27 am
On March 26, 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada granted leave to appeal the decision of the Alberta Court of Appeal in Canada v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 2:02 pm
In the recent case of Tecnicas Reunidas Saudia (TRS) v The Korea Development Bank (the Bank), for which the judgment was published last week, the High Court, Queen’s Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court (the TCC)) considered a demand guarantee executed by the Bank in favor of TRS, which formed part of an agreement around certain advance payments made by TRS to a subcontractor. [read post]
26 May 2020, 10:29 am
" Queen v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 6:30 am
The other is that Texas v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:17 am
The Northern Regional Health Authority (“NRHA”) appealed the Commission’s decision to the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench (“MBQB”) on the issue of jurisdiction. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm
An Australian law firm’s “Tips and tricks for online hearings” refers to a ruling by the Federal Court of Australia that a case with 50 witnesses that was scheduled for six weeks would proceed virtually, despite the objection of one of the parties (Capic v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited (Adjournment)). [read post]
11 May 2020, 4:02 pm
The general practice, prior to 1 October 2019, already was to issue in the Queen’s Bench Division (“QBD”) in order that the matter could then be heard by a specialist judge with experience of these types of disputes. [read post]
6 May 2020, 10:37 am
In Jobaida v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 6:42 am
Montreal; Buffalo: McGill-Queen’s University Press, c1995. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 12:48 pm
” Some U.S. commentators compared the case to Marbury v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 7:47 am
They act as a representative of the Attorney General’s office, the Canadian government, and by extension, the Queen. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:39 am
V. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
In Queen v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:03 am
Summary Charterers successfully appealed an arbitration award under section 69 Arbitration Act 1996 on the basis that Owners did not submit all supporting documents for a demurrage claim within the 90-day time bar under the charterparty. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 4:30 am
NielsF / CC BY-SA (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/) Jane Lambert Queen's Bench Division (Mr Justice Griffiths) DSN v Blackpool Football Club Ltd [2020] EWHC 670 (QB) (20 March 2020) Paragraph 8 of the Practice Direction - Pre-Action Conduct and Protocols which I discussed in Practice Direction - Pre-Action Conduct and Protocols Update on 12 Oct 2019 advises: " [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 5:02 am
In Tuesday's Edwards v. [read post]
