Search for: "RIDER v. STATE" Results 581 - 600 of 784
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
Clement of the Washington law firm of Bancroft PLLC, representing 26 states, followed by Michael D. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Montana. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:57 am by Steve Davies
ANALYSIS The cornerstones of plaintiffs’ separation of powers challenge were laid in the mid-19th century when the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:09 am by admin
State Bd. of Equalization (1978) 22 Cal.3d 208, 225-227; County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 9:56 pm by Jim Walker
  Flag states like Bermuda, Bahamas and Panama will never meddle into the cruise lines' business. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm by Soroush Seifi
 In distinguishing Windisman[28], Winkler J. had stated that in Sutherland the work of the RP was unnecessary to the preparation or presentation of the case. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 12:34 pm
The controversy surrounding the helmet law can be traced to the decision in the State of Florida v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 2:03 pm by Lovechilde
” Regardless of the science, Republican lawmakers and even presidential candidate Rick Perry endorsed the fetal pain concept in order to challenge the Roe v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:39 am by Orin Kerr
In People v Nappo (94 NY2d 564 [2000]), we held that the State was not the “owner” of uncollected taxes within the meaning of the statutory definition of the term because “taxes due were not the property of the State prior to their remittance” (id. at 566). [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 12:12 pm by Stephen Jenei
The Multi-Peril policy was introduced in 2005 by IPISC, available as a rider to the Abatement and/or the Defense policies, and is likewise increasing in demand. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 10:34 am by Kirk Jenkins
Giannoulias, No. 110611 -- Does a state statute permitting the transfer of funds from the Cycle Rider Safety Training Fund to the General Revenue Fund violate the Takings Clause of either the federal or state constitutions? [read post]