Search for: "Reade v. C. I. R"
Results 581 - 600
of 2,891
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2015, 4:15 pm
The second case, Brost v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 1:58 pm
Teller, 53 P.3d 240, 249 (Haw. 2002). = = = = L·U·B·R·I·C·I·O·U·S [T]he patent fails to teach how the invention actually achieves lubriciousness. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:22 pm
While State v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 5:33 pm
Do we start with the C prompt and menus and then move to the graphical user interface? [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
I have recently discussed whether objections against stylised device marks containing descriptive words should be raised under Articles 7(1)(b) and/or (c) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 12:06 am
The Court noted that whist a SOPO was a valuable tool in the control of sexual offending, as had been noted in R v R & C [2010] EWCA Crim 907, they were often too hastily and inadequately drafted and provided at a late stage in the sentencing process. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 6:49 am
Code § 875(c).U.S. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
He gave Article 23 DPD a very narrow reading, contrary to CJEU decisions such as Case C–168/00 Leitner v TUI Deutschland GmbH [2002] ECR I–1631 (ECLI:EU:C:2002:163; ECJ, 12 March 2002), which held that compensation for “damage” must include both material and non-material damage, that is, both actual damage and distress (see also Case C-63/09 Walz v Clickair SA [2010] ECR I 4239… [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 5:54 am
Shaw Development, LLC, in the Circuit Court of Maryland for Somerset County, case no. 19-C-07-011405. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 4:05 am
” Ryan v New York Tel. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
§ 5321(a)(5)(C)(i) (2004), supersedes 31 C.F.R. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:38 pm
I. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:49 am
Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
Neither did I, before reading this post by eLAWonora! [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
Stockman v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 3:16 pm
Medical Device v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 4:30 am
See Rules of Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR 1200.0) Rule I .2(c). [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 74 [week ending on Sunday 29 November] – Bob Marley copyright | Nintendo TPM triumphs in Italy | GIs and TMs in the EU | Prebalin again | YouTube will defend fair use | End-of-year reading |Stretchline Intellectual Properties Ltd v H&M Hennes & Mauritz UK Ltd | Goodbye from Jeremy, and thank you from us | Greekat on plain packaging | Rovi Guides Inc v Virgin Media… [read post]
11 May 2017, 11:45 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:45 am
So what can we take away from Iancu v. [read post]
