Search for: "Response Brief for the United States Regarding Jurisdiction"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2018, 12:08 pm
” Chief Justice John Roberts was perplexed by that response. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 4:30 pm
Today, the Department of Justice filed an emergency application with the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:49 pm
Lyon continued to live and work in England full-time and only traveled to the United States for brief vacations. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:49 pm
Lyon continued to live and work in England full-time and only traveled to the United States for brief vacations. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:28 pm
’ We ask: (1) whether the wrongful conduct occurred in the United States, and (2) whether the wrongful conduct had a substantial effect in the United States or upon United States citizens. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
This summary provides brief updates on recent environmental cases, legislation, and administrative actions in 2020. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:29 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 10:36 am
I doubt it, in light of the Obama Administration's position regarding the "states secrets" privilege. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 3:00 am
See United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:26 am
Once a written determination is made by the responsible public entity, the records afforded protection under this subdivision shall continue to be protected from disclosure when in the possession of any affected jurisdiction or affected local jurisdiction. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
We cite the corpus linguistics amicus brief written by James Heilpern in Lucia v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:09 am
In the United States, the State Department—while welcoming Ayyash’s conviction—noted that “Hezbollah operatives do not freelance,” suggesting the tribunal should have been able to attribute responsibility further up the chain of command. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 11:42 am
§ 2241(e)(2), applies to “any other action against the United States or its agents relating to any aspect of the detention, transfer, treatment, trial, or conditions of confinement of an alien who is or was detained by the United States and has been determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:09 pm
” Section 1519 provides that: Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case,… [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
“[A]nnually report[s] to Congress on cybersecurity threats and issues facing the United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 12:11 pm
But at a minimum, it is clear that Durham was not appointed pursuant to these regulations—in particular, because 28 C.F.R § 600.3 provides that “The Special Counsel shall be selected from outside the United States Government. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 8:41 am
Here 6(b)(1) states that the PTAB has the “duty. . . . [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
United States 12-1092Issue: Whether the Fifth Circuit erred when, in direc [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 11:17 am
Reference to title 35, United States Code.Sec. 3. [read post]
