Search for: "Rick Hasen"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,165
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2014, 10:34 am
Second, UC Irvine law professor Rick Hasen has a post on his Election Law blog that predicts that such a legislative fix is inevitable. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:19 am
Commentary on Paroline comes from Rick Hasen, who predicts at his Election Law Blog that Congress will step in to override the Court’s decision, “and probably relatively quickly,” and from Marci Hamilton, who proposes a possible fix at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:02 pm
Rick Hasen of Election Law Blog and Eugene Volokh of The Volokh Conspiracy provide early commentary. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 5:18 am
As Rick Hasen has noted, the Court is likely to focus on these threshold questions and — if the Court reverses the U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 4:11 am
In The Tampa Tribune, William March reports on yesterday’s denial of certiorari in a case seeking review of a lower court ruling that invalidated efforts by Florida governor Rick Scott to subject state employees to random drug tests. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 6:26 am
” At his Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen notes that Justice Stephen Breyer’s dissenting opinion in McCutcheon v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 4:42 am
” At his Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen examines the Court’s orders in James v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 5:02 am
In the Daily Journal (via his Election Law Blog), Rick Hasen discusses the solo concurring opinion filed in the case by Justice Clarence Thomas, while in a post at The Guardian Hasen argues that “[i]t’s about time for Congress to pass some new laws protecting voting rights, and it’s high time . . . for us to dare the supreme court to strike even more of them down. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:53 pm
Collins (also of this blog) at Concurring Opinions, Damon Root at Reason’s Hit & Run Blog, Daniel Fisher of Forbes, Rick Hasen for Slate, Thomas Mann for the FixGov blog at Brookings, Ilya Shapiro for Cato at Liberty, Noah Feldman for Bloomberg View, Lawrence Lessig for The Daily Beast, Ian Millhiser for Think Progress, and various legal experts in a post by Ashby Jones at The Wall Street Journal’s Law Blog. . [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 4:14 pm
Rick Hasen’s piece today on Slate is a good example: [W]e have vintage Roberts playing the long game. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 1:44 pm
* Professor Rick Hasen drops knowledge bombs all over the “subtly awful” decision in McCutcheon. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 1:25 pm
Here's the rundown:Honored guests will include justices of the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeal, and the Appellate Division of Los Angeles Superior Court.Guest SpeakerProfessor Rick Hasen,Chancellor's Professor of Law, UC Irvine School of LawProfessor Hasen will speak on "Abuse of Discretion? [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 5:34 am
Rick Hasen responds to that criticism at his Election Law Blog, describing himself as “truly puzzled” by the post, while Michael McGough does the same in an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 4:55 pm
As leading voting rights scholar Rick Hasen points out, social science research shows that early voters are, on average, better-informed than those who vote on election day. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:01 pm
Professor Rick Hasen did. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 9:42 am
Election law professors like Rick Hasen have been quite negative.. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 5:35 am
” At his Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen live-tweeted Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s appearance at the University of California-Irvine School of Law. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 1:11 pm
Rick Hasen (UC Irvine) has more. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:06 am
Rick Hasen (UC Irvine) has more. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 5:49 am
Lyle Denniston reported on the latest developments for this blog; other coverage and commentary come from Rick Hasen, who suggests at his Election Law Blog that “what looks like a victory against having to do a symbolic act may really be a defeat in having to do the nearly identical symbolic act”; from Michael Dorf at Dorf on Law, who contends that “it is hard not to read the order as reflecting at least some view on the merits”; and from Leland E. [read post]
