Search for: "Robert S. Crawford"
Results 581 - 600
of 632
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2007, 9:06 am
Helpfully, a double-secret source from inside the Court sent me a copy of today's page from the new Chief's day-planner. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 10:12 pm
Crawford overruled Roberts because Roberts was inconsistent with the original understanding of the Confrontation Clause, not because the Crawford rule's overall effect would be to improve the accuracy of factfinding in criminal trials. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 12:18 pm
On the subject of Justice Scalia's age, here's an interesting squib from Jan Crawford Greenburg's most excellent new book, Supreme Conflict, describing how Justice Scalia edged out Judge Robert Bork as a SCOTUS nominee: [T]he politics of the nomination turned on age and compatibility. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 9:56 am
Some highlights (all emphases added): -- Justice Robert P. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 1:19 pm
At Legalities, Jan Crawford Greenburg updated this post in response to Greenhouse's column. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 8:24 am
What's fascinating is that the court did not claim to be applying Crawford retroactively. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 2:30 am
Jan Crawford Greenburg's Supreme Conflict ends with a bang. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 4:06 pm
Indeed, the old Roberts rule required "reliability" before hearsay testimony could be admitted, and Crawford actually reduced Roberts' protection in one respect by allowing unreliable nontestimonial statements to come in as hearsay. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 1:16 pm
At Legalities, ABC News correspondent Jan Crawford Greenburg reports here discussing Wednesday's argument and what she characterizes as Justice Ginsburg's frail appearance. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 5:26 pm
In her post about the Hein oral argument, Jan Crawford Greenburg included an interesting observation. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 2:27 pm
Roberts was made for that job. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 7:03 am
.: Today's decision in Whorton v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 2:59 pm
Mahoney's name is in the air again, as a result of this interview with Jan Crawford Greenburg, author of the recently published, and acclaimed, book, Supreme Conflict . [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 1:10 pm
In today's Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports here on yesterday's argument in Scott v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 12:30 am
Jan Crawford Greenburg, author of Supreme Conflict, will take us inside the Court to tell the back story of the Rehnquist and Roberts courts. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
Lawrence tells us that the rule continues to hold true under the Roberts Court. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 1:15 pm
Finally, Emily Bazelon has a review of Jan Crawford Greenburg's Supreme Conflict here. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 8:54 am
Thanks again to Jan Crawford Greenburg for participating. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 8:54 am
(It's impossible to see Roberts writing Dickerson, for example.) [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 10:30 am
Last week, we invited readers to submit questions to ABC News's Jan Crawford Greenburg about her new book, Supreme Conflict: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Control of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
