Search for: "Rome v. State"
Results 581 - 600
of 710
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2020, 7:53 pm
The Prosecutor reached this decision on admissibility grounds under Article 17 of the Rome Statute. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 12:59 am
The case, The Gambia v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 11:23 am
Fuller v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:32 am
Stephen Pitel, Jesse Harper, Choice of Law for Tort in Canada: Reasons for Change In 1994 the Supreme Court of Canada in Tolofson v Jensen adopted a new and controversial choice of law rule for tort claims. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
On the issue of justiciability of the claim based on infringement of United States copyright, the Court had this to say: "87. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
” Copyright Promotes Knowledge The copyright statutes passed in the States prior to the drafting of the Constitution use similar language. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 8:49 am
Accordingly, it rejected the admissibility of the questions referred to the Court concerning the Rome III Regulation. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 8:19 am
In November 2019, an administrative court in Rome ruled that the conversion price was wrong. [read post]
Italy's Constitutional Referendum: A View From Italy in Conversation With Flora and Alessandro Sapio
3 Dec 2016, 7:43 pm
This post considers the constitutional referendum in broader context of the techniques and management of democratic engagement in Western liberal states. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:00 pm
An embassy, with the earl of Wiltshire at its head, was dispatched to Rome in 1530, and Cranmer was an important member of it. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:33 am
Historically, natural law theory originates with the pagan Greeks, finds its way by complex pathways to Rome, and is already brought to a high pitch of sophistication by the Roman lawyers of the late Republic and early Empire, largely before Christianity became dominant. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 12:36 am
In Nemariam v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 2:41 am
As a consequence, courts were urged to develop the notion of frustration of the contract, which allows for termination of an agreement when the circumstances are “in a fundamental respect different from those which were envisaged”.6)In the definition of Davis Contractos Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:56 pm
Deaton Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:44 pm
We can see this in the ICJ’s decision in Bosnia and Herzegovina v. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 5:42 am
ItalyCasaPound v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Despite its republican traditions, in its imperial phase, Rome was a dictatorship—sometimes a benevolent one, but a dictatorship nonetheless—because truly representative government demands civilian control of state force. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Despite its republican traditions, in its imperial phase, Rome was a dictatorship—sometimes a benevolent one, but a dictatorship nonetheless—because truly representative government demands civilian control of state force. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 6:18 am
They summarize the basic human rights obligations of States on environmental matters. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 1:23 pm
Finally, and consistently with the decision in Case C-269/95, Benincasa v. [read post]
