Search for: "S Line Capital LLC"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,090
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
Hospira, Inc., No. 15-1210 (bright line limits on secondary indicia of nonobviousness) [CubistPetition] Vehicle Intelligence and Safety LLC v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am
Beach, No. 15-1089 (written description requirement for new drug treatments) Retirement Capital Access Management Company, LLC v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 3:04 pm
How should I structure the sale to minimize taxes, income versus capital gains (Source: Forbes 7/26/2015) We work closely with business owners to help assure the net sale price is in line with your financial goals. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am
Beach, No. 15-1089 (written description requirement for new drug treatments) Retirement Capital Access Management Company, LLC v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
He continued to state that “A municipal advisor’s first duty should be to its municipal client, not its own bottom line. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
Beach, No. 15-1089 (written description requirement for new drug treatments) Retirement Capital Access Management Company, LLC v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 4:18 am
The Concord Monitor makes a point in its opening line: Owen Labrie refuses to go down quietly. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:34 am
FLORIDA CAPITAL GROUP, INC., a Florida corporation; CHARLES E. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
Hospira, the petitioner-patentee challenges the Federal Circuit’s increasingly bright line limits on secondary indicia of nonobviousness. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Representatives for current and future asbestos claimants against Coltec Industries Inc (EnPro’s direct subsidiary and GST’s direct parent) also joined in the settlement. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
” Justice Scheinkman faulted Schaeffer’s discounted cash flow analysis, inter alia, for not taking into account capital expenditures and working capital. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
” Justice Scheinkman faulted Schaeffer’s discounted cash flow analysis, inter alia, for not taking into account capital expenditures and working capital. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
” Justice Scheinkman faulted Schaeffer’s discounted cash flow analysis, inter alia, for not taking into account capital expenditures and working capital. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 6:46 pm
Meyer Enterprises LLC, 34 Maple Ave. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 9:41 am
” According to the company’s website, LinnCo is a limited liability company created to enhance LINN Energy LLC ability to raise additional equity capital to execute a growth strategy. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 12:06 pm
The firm’s David Halberstein was quoted this week in reports by the Daily Business Review, South Florida Business Journal and The Real Deal about his work together with partner Oscar Rivera in representing Doral Costa Capital LLC (an affiliate of Aventura-based Triarch Investment Group Inc.) in its acquisition of three Doral office buildings for $73.75 million (approximately $259 per sq. ft.) [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 12:06 pm
The firm’s David Halberstein was quoted this week in reports by the Daily Business Review, South Florida Business Journal and The Real Deal about his work together with partner Oscar Rivera in representing Doral Costa Capital LLC (an affiliate of Aventura-based Triarch Investment Group Inc.) in its acquisition of three Doral office buildings for $73.75 million (approximately $259 per sq. ft.) [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 12:06 pm
The firm’s David Halberstein was quoted this week in reports by the Daily Business Review, South Florida Business Journal and The Real Deal about his work together with partner Oscar Rivera in representing Doral Costa Capital LLC (an affiliate of Aventura-based Triarch Investment Group Inc.) in its acquisition of three Doral office buildings for $73.75 million (approximately $259 per sq. ft.) [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 4:56 am
The prosecutor’s decision to seek capital charges, after all, didn’t directly relate to the Brady claim that now forms the gist of Williams’s claim. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm
In Rule 10b-5 suits, some courts have read Omnicare’s first line of inquiry as consistent with existing “subjective belief” precedent but also cite Omnicare for the proposition that “in some circumstances, an omission may render a statement of opinion misleading. [read post]
