Search for: "S. H. V. United States" Results 581 - 600 of 5,119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2014, 2:14 pm
It is the defendant’s contention that judgment was obtained in violation of a right of his right under the constitution of this state or of the United States pursuant to C.P.L. 440.10(1)(h). [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 6:33 am by Beth Graham
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court dismissed the latest petition in Henry Schein, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
” Waltersheid, The Early Evolution of the United States Patent Law: Antecedents (Part 3), 77 J. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:37 am by Kiran Bhat
The Court also released an opinion yesterday in United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 4:33 pm by Clayton Graham
Northshore United Church, et al. the Supreme Court of Washington held that the City’s "total refusal" to process a land use application for a homeless encampment on Church property violated the Washington state constitution. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 11:57 am by Cormac Early
Perry and United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 6:29 am by Matt Sundquist
Not surprisingly, coverage of last week’s oral argument in McDonald v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 3:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The B & H law firm commenced two separate actions on the plaintiff’s behalf against alleged owners of the loading dock. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 6:50 am by Legal Talk Network
Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the Judge “ran afoul” of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges given her participation in media interviews and by making public statements about the “stop and frisk” case. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
January 27: The Radicals' Fund: Experimenting with Democracy in America's First Age of Propaganda, John Fabian Witt, Allen H. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 8:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court of the United States further lay the ground for this question in 2011 in William H. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:07 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
In particular, the Court deferred to the BIA’s narrow interpretation of INA §203(h)(3), 8 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 7:17 am by Jessica A. Huse
Plaintiffs filed this trademark action in 2015 against hundreds of defendants, including the H&H Defendants, alleging that they had violated Abbott’s rights by selling the international version of Abbott’s diabetes test strips in the United States. [read post]