Search for: "SHERMAN v. STATE" Results 581 - 600 of 1,960
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2018, 11:24 am by Amanda Pickens Nitto
Here is a recap of February filings: Burrell, et al. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Amended Complaint alleges that Todtman Nachamie represented plaintiffs from August 2004 until April 2005, whereupon RFS represented plaintiffs from April 20058 until April 2012. 9 Plaintiffs rely on two cases which apply the continuous representation doctrine to toll the statute of limitations as to a prior law firm’s representation when attorneys from a prior firm left and moved to another firm (HNH Intl., Ltd. v Pryor Cashman Sherman & Flynn, 63 AD3d 534 [l st… [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 3:33 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks when erroneous applications of the U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
In the Barnett/Blackman constitutional law casebook, we included this introduction to United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 7:33 am by Joy Waltemath
The au pairs filed suit claiming that the agencies violated the Sherman Antitrust Act, RICO, the FLSA, and the laws of several states. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 5:32 am by Andrew Hamm
” For the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh reports that one of those cases, United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Encino Motorcars v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 9:53 am by Eric Goldman
This time, it added Yahoo and Microsoft, styled the case as a putative class action, and alleged violations of the Lanham Act, the Sherman Antitrust Act, and 5 state laws. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 9:53 am by Eric Goldman
This time, it added Yahoo and Microsoft, styled the case as a putative class action, and alleged violations of the Lanham Act, the Sherman Antitrust Act, and 5 state laws. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 7:05 am by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-5165 Issue: Whether Richardson v. [read post]