Search for: "STATE OF CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF LABOR STANDARDS" Results 581 - 600 of 720
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2011, 12:40 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division (DOL) charges that that the company violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by improperly classifying workers as exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act and failed to pay the workers for all compensable hours worked. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 11:56 am
It provides that when a dispute exists between an employer and an employee over earned wages that is the subject of a pending certified or uncertified class action or representative action, a waiver, release, or settlement is invalid unless all parties are represented by counsel, a Superior Court approves the release, or the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement has negotiated a settlement between the parties. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:42 pm by Steven G. Pearl
After he left defendant, plaintiff filed a wage claim before the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE). [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 6:14 pm by AALRR
  Notably, the Court of Appeal expressly rejected the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement’s interpretation that section 515(d) does forbid such explicit mutual wage agreements, citing the California Supreme Court’s admonishment in Martinez v. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 11:15 am
Castro was also fined $11,000 for willfully repeating violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 1:57 pm by Matt Bartus
” Following AB 60, the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement took the position that the new statute precluded these explicit mutual wage agreements and that any salary must be divided by 40 hours to calculate the regular rate and time and half of that rate must be paid for all overtime in addition to the salary. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 1:29 pm by Sheppard Mullin
The Court also rejected the interpretation set forth in the Divisions of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE) manual that explicit wage agreements are "no longer allowed as a result of specific language adopted by the Legislature at Labor Code § 515(d). [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:34 pm by The Complex Litigator
 Immediately thereafter, in a footnote, the Court said, "Appellant's reliance on the Enforcement Policies and Interpretations Manual of the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement is unavailing because regulators did not properly adopt it, making it non-binding on courts. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 6:46 am by Andrew Frisch
Filed under: Department of Labor, Exemptions, Recordkeeping Tagged: DOL, Exemptions, Fair Labor Standards Act, FLSA, Overtime, Overtime Law, Proposed Regulations, Recordkeeping, Recordkeeping Burden, Wage and Hour Division, WHD [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:38 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Irwin, California have paid a combined total of $1,060,554 in back wages to settle claims they violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by failing to properly pay for on-call time, the U.S. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 1:35 pm
The investigation then covered eight other states, including California, Texas, Georgia, Arizona, New Mexico, North and South Carolina. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am by Christa Culver
California Pharmacists AssociationDocket: 09-1158Issue(s): (1) Whether Medicaid recipients and providers may maintain a cause of action under the Supremacy Clause to enforce § 1396a(a)(30)(A) by asserting that the provision preempts a state law reducing reimbursement rates; and (2) whether a state law reducing Medicaid reimbursement to providers may be held preempted by § 1396a(a)(30)(A) based on requirements that do not appear in the text of the… [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:03 am
" The court reached a similar conclusion when analyzing whether Payday was an employer for purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:27 pm by AALRR
Finding that these were precisely the kind of “management duties” that the state Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE) identified as qualifying for the exemption, the court had little difficulty finding that they satisfied the “duties test” for application of the executive exemption.The court next turned to the issue of whether Taylor actually had the authority to hire and fire employees and exercised independent judgment and… [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 12:53 pm
Our employment attorneys based in Santa Ana, California have been following the United States Department of Labor's (DOL) announcement that the department has recovered over $330,000 in back wages from San-Tec Electric, Inc, for twenty-seven electrical mechanics working for the company. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 11:00 pm by Mike
Due to the volume of requests being reviewed as well as the division of labor in the dental department, a reasonable jury might conclude that Dr. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
“For the office nearest you, go to the Labor Commissioner’s website at www.dir.ca.gov or check the State government pages at the front of your telephone book under Labor Commissioner or Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
“The IWC intended that, like overtime pay provisions, payment for missed meal and rest periods be enacted as a premium wage to compensate employees, while also acting as an incentive for employers to comply with labor standards. [read post]