Search for: "STATE v COOL"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,411
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2015, 11:14 am
Johnson v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 6:37 am
My understanding is that municipalities moved away from them after Shavitz v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 6:39 am
As an initial matter, the state high court examined the plain language of the regulation. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 7:59 am
They are very cool. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 10:15 pm
The heated rhetoric around the Supreme Court’s June 26 decision allowing same-sex marriages in all 50 states is showing no signs of cooling off. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 9:48 am
” Sorrell v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 1:33 pm
I believe marriages and / or couplings are interesting and can be very cool. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 1:30 am
The Court’s 2000 holding in Bush v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 8:44 am
United States, No. 13-983. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:38 am
State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 12:46 pm
The answer, of course, is raisins, from today’s Horne v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
United States? [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 1:00 pm
No one yet knows how SCOTUS will rule in King v Burntwell, but that hasn't stopped the doomsayers from claiming that a gazillion people will "lose their subsidies" should Plaintiff (King) prevail.No, they won't.That's because you can't lose something to which you were never entitled.The fact of the matter is, should SCOTUS insist that the law be applied as it was written, then folks in states using the 404Care.gov site were never eligible to receive… [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
’ The juvenile court stated, `Two to three hours of tweets that -- I just don't see how you can get around it. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
The book describes the litigation in Kelo v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 5:32 am
The United States Supreme Court issues its long-awaited decision in Elonis v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 5:57 am
I thought Jerad was cool, but fuck him, he was a CI. [read post]
28 May 2015, 5:08 am
,Alston v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:00 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Committee for a Better Arvin v. [read post]
