Search for: "STATE v FLOYD"
Results 581 - 600
of 854
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2013, 3:59 am
At first instance Mr Justice Floyd found the patent valid (under the headings of novelty, inventive step and sufficiency) although he construed the claim in one respect (the meaning of " a medicament for the treatment of a non-neoplastic disease or disorder characterised by undesirable excessive neovascularisation") in a manner different from that put forward by either the claimants or the defendant, stating: I see no reason to recast the definition either as… [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:29 pm
Mr Justice Floyd allowed the proposed amendments to the '881 patent and held the patent to be valid. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:28 am
According to U.S. ex rel Davis v. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 6:18 pm
In Holland v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 2:23 pm
(Yeah, Gamso, you've made this point before, too.)In Kansas v. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
Floyd, 2012 WL 2500900, (Tenn. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:49 pm
Paul Alston of Alston Hunt Floyd & Ing. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:31 pm
Just consider the shellacking the OSG took in United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 8:27 am
His next book, Nuanced Absolutism: Floyd Abrams and the First Amendment, comes out this January. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 7:47 am
See State Oil Co. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 4:38 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:18 am
Coverage continues of the amicus briefs filed earlier this week in Fisher v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:25 am
Floyd Abrams is a partner at Cahill Gordon & Reindel. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 11:44 am
United States (1971) and in Branzburg v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 11:44 am
United States (1971) and in Branzburg v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:48 am
Citing the dicta of Lord Hoffmann in Conor v Angiotech [2008] UKHL 49 and adopting the structured approach in Pozzoli v BDMO [2007] EWCA Civ 588, Floyd held that it would not have been obvious to the skilled addressee to extend the seat into bed mode into the triangular space between the back of the seat and the cabin wall (the green section) which, in the BA First application, remained unused except for storage. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:40 am
Armstrong v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 11:45 am
On July 26, 2012, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals decided WEC Carolina Energy Solutions LLC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 10:09 am
The government will need to craft an argument to sidestep this landmine, and I'm not sure they'll be able to do it.I am highly persuaded by Judge Floyd's reasoning, and I absolutely agree that Congress never intended any interaction between agency theory and the CFAA. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 11:18 am
"Recognizing a split in the authority from other circuits, the Court joined with the more restrictive Ninth Circuit view stated in United States v. [read post]
