Search for: "STATE v WATERS" Results 581 - 600 of 10,827
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2011, 1:25 pm
United States, a major wetlands case, almost five years ago. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 11:45 pm by Jeff Gittins
This case focuses on the interpretation of navigability under the Public Water Access Act.In the 2008 decision in Conatser v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 5:42 pm by Record on Appeal
Yesterday, May 11, 2011, the Hawaii ICA panel of Judges Foley, Fujise, and Reifurth heard oral arguments in State v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 1:38 pm by WIMS
      In 2010, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS or the agency) therefore limited commercial fishing in those waters, causing representatives of the fishing industry and the State of Alaska (Plaintiffs) to file this action challenging the limitations. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:34 pm by WIMS
Montana's allegation that Wyoming has breached Article V(A) of the Compact by allowing its pre-1950 water users to increase their irrigation efficiency thus fails to state a claim. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:50 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Brigadier General Mark Martins’s statement regarding this week’s hearings in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 5:01 am by Sam Cohen, Alex Vivona
” As described below, and in other Water Wars columns, China has often acted in contravention of UNCLOS and continues to claim nearly the entire South China Sea as its territorial waters. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 8:25 am
Green Drop on Bottled Water Label Not Misleading for “Reasonable Consumer”This posting was written by William Zale, Editor of CCH Advertising Law Guide.No reasonable consumer would be misled to think that the green drop on the label of Fiji bottled water represented a third party organization’s endorsement or that Fiji water was environmentally superior to that of the competition, a California appellate court has ruled.A purchaser attempted to assert… [read post]
18 May 2023, 4:45 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Klamath Irrigation District Cert Petition.pdfDownload Question presented: Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19 requires dismissal of an action challenging a federal agency’s use of water subject to state-adjudicated water rights if a Native American tribe asserts an interest in the suit and does not consent to joinder. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Sean Quirk
Article V obligates U.S. support in an armed attack against “territories under the administration of Japan. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 1:59 pm by Unknown
Find all of the latest updates at narf.org/nill/bulletins/Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2020.htmlUnited States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 7:41 pm
Robin Kundis Craig, Justice Kennedy and Ecosystem Services: A Functional Approach to Clean Water Act Jurisdiction after Rapanos, 38 Environmental Law Review 635 (2008) The United States Supreme Court’s most recent-and fractured-decision regarding Clean Water Act jurisdiction, Rapanos v. [read post]