Search for: "STATE v. MYERS"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,431
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2024, 1:39 pm
Myers v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:46 am
However, “allegations consisting of bare legal conclusions as well as factual claims flatly contradicted by documentary evidence are not entitled to any such consideration” (Maas v Cornell Univ., 94 NY2d 87, 91 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Myers v Schneiderman, 30 NY3d 1, 11). [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:50 am
Ct. 746 (2014)—and particularly in light of the Court’s more recent decisions in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 1:19 pm
Myers v. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 6:24 am
Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 7:29 am
Chief Justice William Howard Taft, in Myers v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 10:37 am
Subsequently, in Myers, M.D. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 6:15 pm
Justice Myers started by stating, [1] Tweets span international boundaries, making for jurisdictional issues with respect to the adjudication of legal claims relating to them. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:52 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
"The Circuit Court said "This language cannot be reasonably interpreted to explicitly state that benefits vested as soon as a worker became eligible for a pension or to retire" as the phrase "shall be provided" in the Plan refers to "retired employees," rather than to current employees who might retire in the future.There have been a number of cases addressing the continuation of health insurance coverage upon retirement decided by New York courts.In… [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 11:40 am
Supreme Court rulings: Pliva Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 1:32 am
- Denver attorney Stan V. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:00 am
Myers v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:30 am
Gavron v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:18 am
Chief Justice Roberts in a 5-4 decision (conservatives v. liberals), declared as unconstitutional the "dual for-cause limitations on the removal of [PCAOB] Board members". [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
(Practitioners should take a look at the cited decision, Myers v. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 12:15 am
Professor Bainbridge focuses his analysis on three old Supreme Court decisions - Myers v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 10:00 am
Bristol Myers Squibb Co., 2014 U.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 7:49 am
Div. 1996) (quoting Myers v. [read post]
