Search for: "STILL v. STATE" Results 581 - 600 of 50,270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2019, 3:15 am by ASAD KHAN
Supreme Court allows tortured Tamil asylum-seeker’s appeal KV (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] UKSC 10 (6 March 2019) In a recent judgment given by Lord Wilson the Supreme Court unanimously allowed KV’s appeal, remitting the matter to the UT for fresh determination. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 12:16 am by Joseph Arshawsky
Cosmetic Warriors Ltd., United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, No. 17-55325, 29 June 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Trademark Blog. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 4:23 pm
So if $600 gets garnished from your monthly Social Security check to pay your IRS debt, that $600 still counts as part of your monthly income to determine what welfare programs for which you might or might not be eligible.Now, Legal Aid has a point; that's somewhat silly, because you're still poor, since you don't actually get the $600, so it seems a bit crazy to say that you're not poor because "in theory" you get an extra $600 a month (that you… [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 3:09 pm by Josh Blackman
In December 2022, the Supreme Court heard the latest iteration of a case styled as United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 10:42 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Callaghan, September 22, 2016, Court of Appeal -Fourth Appellate District – State of California More Blog Entries: Alcala v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 9:26 am
"Weiner was referring to a 1987 Supreme Court decision (McNally v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The court properly dismissed plaintiff’s claim pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) because he failed to state a cause of action (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87 [1994]). [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:28 am by Dave Waller
Posted by Dave WallerBecause hospitality developers are increasingly being encouraged, and in some cases required, to comply with the LEED rating system, we have been keeping an eye on Gifford v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 2:46 pm
And the crowd, myself included, was pointing and roaring while he was still hundreds of feet off the ground. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 8:12 am
From Russ Bensing at The Briefcase comes the news that Ohio's 8th District Court of Appeals affirmed a suppression motion in State v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:13 am by Venkat Balasubramani
There’s also of course the difference between the state of affairs when the statute was passed (e.g., before Netflix) to the changing landscape of content consumption today. [read post]