Search for: "STRAND v. US "
Results 581 - 600
of 647
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
All these listed threats except for the first one (political repression of certain strands of teaching and research) and the fourth one (civil society threats to academic freedom) can be linked to or have elements that relate to a phenomenon we term ‘the commercialisation’ of academia, as conceptualised and used in the AFITE project. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 6:14 am
Against this backdrop, CAAT’s submissions on the assessment of a “clear risk” was subdivided into three strands. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 6:00 am
" Fashion Fabrics of Iowa v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 1:24 pm
Though tightly intertwined in everyday operation, it is useful to disentangle them to understand each strand better. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 7:54 am
Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
The only thing in common is the use of the term itself. they invoke entirely different conceptions. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:22 am
"—Abstract.Mikhail V. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 5:37 am
In the case of Ivorian League For Human Rights (Lidho) And others v. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 11:09 pm
positive-stranded RNA genome of? [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
It is the face of Dred Scott v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:17 pm
Please use this version. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
The world hit a record level of carbon emissions in 2022[24] and is projected to warm by 2.5-3°C by 2100.[25]Estimates of climate-related losses include: 18 percent global GDP loss by 2050 under a business-as-usual case (Swiss Re)[26]; nearly 25 percent cumulative loss in global output in the next two decades if mitigation actions are not taken (BlackRock)[27]; 10 percent GDP loss by 2050 for temperature increases above 3°C (Vanguard)[28]; 15-20 percent cumulative reduction in GDP by 2100… [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
., the editors of the 1962 edition that is still widely used today. [read post]
27 Feb 2016, 1:01 am
The case I attended was listed as AM -v- UH and EO and TH 1281945401 – Where UH should live – HEARING IN PUBLIC. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 2:09 pm
—on goods and services brought in from out-of-state and used or sold in California. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 7:23 am
” The line, “we are a court, and not a law reform body”, it will be recalled was one strand of Lady Hale’s dissent in the Radmacher v Granatino decision. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
As the Supreme Court noted in DHS v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 6:42 pm
Historically 'stranded capital', in the ireprressible language of utility regulation. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am
Rev. 56, 63–66 (2015) (suggesting after King v. [read post]
