Search for: "Sales v. United States"
Results 581 - 600
of 8,899
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2015, 1:33 pm
In 1992, Quill v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
The Ninth Circuit had held that § 109(a) (First Sale Doctrine) does not apply to items manufactured outside of the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
The Ninth Circuit had held that § 109(a) (First Sale Doctrine) does not apply to items manufactured outside of the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
The Ninth Circuit had held that § 109(a) (First Sale Doctrine) does not apply to items manufactured outside of the United States. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 9:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 3:47 pm
In United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 8:27 am
In responding to the argument that its interpretation of the first sale doctrine would render copyright’s importation provisions superfluous, for example, the Court says that, to the contrary, the provisions “would still forbid importing … copies lawfully made abroad … where … any … licensee, consignee, or bailee sought to send them to the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:11 am
Our decision applies only to [cameras] for which the United States patent right has been exhausted by first sale in the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:11 am
Our decision applies only to [cameras] for which the United States patent right has been exhausted by first sale in the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:11 am
Our decision applies only to [cameras] for which the United States patent right has been exhausted by first sale in the United States. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 2:24 pm
The post Masimo v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 1:51 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 4:54 am
§ 271(e)(1) states: It shall not be an act of infringement to make, use, offer to sell, or sell within the United States or import into the United States a patented invention . . . solely for uses reasonably related to the development and submission of information under a Federal law which regulates the manufacture, use or sale of drugs or veterinary biological products. [read post]
28 May 2013, 11:20 am
The new case denied Tuesday was United Airlines v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 7:33 am
Super. 158, 164 (App.Div.1967); see United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:37 pm
Counsel for NSA and DHS will request from the United States Treasury Judgment Fund one check in the amount of $500 made payable to McCall for the court costs incurred by the plaintiff. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:37 pm
Counsel for NSA and DHS will request from the United States Treasury Judgment Fund one check in the amount of $500 made payable to McCall for the court costs incurred by the plaintiff. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:53 pm
--Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of WisconsinOpinion Date: 9/7/11Cite: Thiesing v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:03 pm
Every action you take in your Miami tax law case is very important because your opponent is the government of the United States. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:42 am
Here is the abstract: The Indian Tribes of the United States occupy an often ambiguous place in our legal system, and nowhere is that ambiguity more pronounced than in the realm of state taxation. [read post]
