Search for: "Samsung"
Results 581 - 600
of 6,682
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2022, 4:23 am
Vivo 8%Hard evidence of OPPO and OnePlus having left the German marketOther patent assertions against OPPO in GermanyWhy OPPO's calculus may simply make economic senseImplications for Apple, Samsung, and XiaomiComparison to previous market impact of other patent enforcement (particularly--but not only--in Germany) and Apple's about-face in the UKTactical implications for Nokia-OPPO licensing negotiationsGerman patent injunction reform: collective failure by Apple, Google, Nvidia,… [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 7:53 am
"It was confirmed that InterDigital's license agreement with Apple--which was apparently last renewed in 2016 (see this Reuters article)--will expire by the end of this quarter, and that the agreement with Samsung will expire by the end of the following quarter (i.e., by the end of the year). [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 4:15 am
Samsung argued that the claims would have been obvious over U.S. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 4:15 am
Samsung argued that the claims would have been obvious over U.S. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 11:25 pm
Two of them are good news for Ericsson, while Apple has avoided an early-stage dismissal of its "patent misuse" defense:Ericsson can now amend its infringement contentions (as well as its technical domestic industry contentions, which involve the same questions as infringement, but not with respect to Apple's products--it's actually about what Ericsson's licensee Samsung does in the U.S. market). [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 10:27 am
"Well, ten years and two weeks ago, this blog reported on Apple sending letters to Samsung's commercial partners in the U.S., portraying Samsung as a patent infringer and urging Samsung's resellers to stop selling certain Galaxy devices. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 10:28 am
Samsung, and notes the following:"Here, Apple invites this Court to inject itself into an ongoing proceeding in Colombia. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 9:52 pm
In Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v LG Display Co Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 466 the Court of Appeal observed that a “clear and compelling justification must be provided” to depart upwards from London 1 Guideline Hourly Rates (GHRs) as “the guideline rates for London 1 already assume that the litigation in question qualifies as ‘very heavy […] [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 1:43 pm
In 2017, Samsung filed an amicus curiae brief in support of the U.S. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 12:45 pm
Google’s failed partnership with Samsung, back in 2012, still looms large over the industry. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 11:00 am
According to a complaint filed in San Francisco federal court, Apple “coerces” consumers who use its smartphones, smart watches and tablets into using its own wallet for contactless payments, unlike makers of Android-based devices that let consumers choose wallets such as Google Pay and Samsung Pay. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 8:55 am
According to a complaint filed in San Francisco federal court, Apple “coerces” consumers who use its smartphones, smart watches and tablets into using its own wallet for contactless payments, unlike makers of Android-based devices that let consumers choose wallets such as Google Pay and Samsung Pay. . . . [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 4:34 am
ACM, New York, NY, USA, 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3503161.3547838 Additional Reading [Samsung Labs] MegaPortraits: One-shot Megapixel Neural Head Avatars Defining Cyber Discovery? [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 10:00 pm
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board recently granted the institution of an inter partes review in Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 10:00 pm
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board recently granted the institution of an inter partes review in Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 10:00 pm
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board recently granted the institution of an inter partes review in Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 10:00 pm
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board recently granted the institution of an inter partes review in Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 10:00 pm
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board recently granted the institution of an inter partes review in Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 10:00 pm
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board recently granted the institution of an inter partes review in Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 11:16 pm
But it is then clear legal error on Judge Brinkman's part to set the bar for a patent PI so high that it is, on the bottom line, exclusively available to direct competitors.His decision also fails to consider that Ericsson's licensees, such as Samsung, do compete with Apple.The ECJ made it abundantly clear that patent PIs must be widely available:"39. [read post]
