Search for: "Securities Co. v. United States" Results 581 - 600 of 3,791
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Of note, the Alberta Court relied on legal developments in the United States in its decision. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
ANALYZING THE LEGAL STANDARD Who counts as an officer of the United States? [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:43 am
June 27, 2013), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the tolling rule established by the United States Supreme Court in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:10 am
Two days later, [he] flew back to the United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 4:25 am
An earlier post had discussed a recent Australian judgment on the role and duties of a non-executive director, Australian Securities and Investment Commission v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 5:01 am
  Currently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is considering Judge McMahon’s dismissal of Southern Cherry Street LLC v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
Thirty-eight should have been the magic number: Article V of the United States Constitution, which lays out the process for Constitutional amendments, provides that a proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by ¾ of the states. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm by ccoleburn
Thirty-eight should have been the magic number: Article V of the United States Constitution, which lays out the process for Constitutional amendments, provides that a proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by ¾ of the states. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 7:45 am by John Jascob
The defendants also allegedly distributed billions of XRP in exchange for non-cash consideration, including labor and market-making services (SEC v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 3:13 am
Higbee Co., 319 F.3d 825, 829 (6th Cir.2003) (en banc) (quoting United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 2:15 pm
Specifically, Triton had agreed to become co-obligor on Rice’s debt to Glaser Weil, and Rice had also pledged his interest in Triton to Glaser Weil as security on his debt. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:49 am by MBettman
“Therefore, this court and the United States Supreme Court agree that statutes of repose are to be read as enacted and not with an intent to circumvent legislatively imposed time limits. [read post]