Search for: "Senat v. State"
Results 581 - 600
of 11,749
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2018, 9:05 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:15 am
The senators' April letter had expressed concern over Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decisions to institute inter partes review (IPR) proceedings in OpenSky Industries, LLC v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 2:23 pm
I think that issue was disposed in the 1975 case of Durkin v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 4:06 pm
Most states allow cameras in their trial courts. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:16 pm
As for Harris v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 11:47 am
"And in precisely two months from today, the Epic Games v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Senate advice and consent to ratification on April 27, 1937. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 2:40 pm
Maryland House Speaker Michael Busch and Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 5:17 am
The bill, which was previously approved by the state Senate, was approved by a vote of 22-16 after five hours of debate and discussion. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 7:45 am
Unanimous decision in Legislature of the State of California v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:44 pm
In a 1979 case called Smith v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 6:23 am
Submissions to the Senate of Canada, Social Affairs, Science, and Technology Standing Committee.Monday, April 30, 2018, 2:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.Bill C-45, An Act respecting cannabis and to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, the Criminal Code and other ActsRead our prepared statement below. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm
But the state senate tried to avoid that endpoint, rushing to pass a civil union bill instead. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 11:54 am
As AG, Blumenthal also launched the Connecticut v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 10:46 am
In Maryland it appears that the good Senators may not be up to speed on the current state of the law. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 10:16 am
Bank v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:34 am
” Michigan State AFL-CIO v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
In Salas v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 6:04 am
For 22 years, since the money laundering statutes enactment in 1986, courts have construed "proceeds" to mean gross receipts and not net profits of illegal activity consistent with the original intent of Congress.But in United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 11:30 am
The bill would override the Supreme Court's rulings in Sutton v. [read post]
