Search for: "Sharp v. State"
Results 581 - 600
of 2,518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2020, 4:29 am
State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:07 pm
Which might start with a critique of the manner in which Judge O'Scannlain unhelpfully begins his opinion, with a first paragraph that reads (in its entirety): "We are called upon to decide whether an alien may be removed from the United States for having been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude as determined under federal immigration law. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:07 pm
The AmeriKat passed out on all of herco-existence agreements...A mammoth decision from Mr Justice Norris plopped on the AmeriKat's desk last week in the long-running awaited trade mark co-existence saga of Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme [2016] EWHC 49 (Pat). [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 11:02 am
On February 12, 2016, in Tvardek v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
In sharp contrast with Nixon v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 4:16 pm
In Newman v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:30 am
Texas (state may not prohibit homosexual acts between consenting adults), Mapp v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 10:20 am
Hurricane Shooters, LLC v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
One report posited that Judge Aiken’s decision “opened a path for an eventual court-mandated, science-based plan to bring about sharp emissions reductions in the United States.[23] Yahoo! [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:34 am
A recent decision by the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division for the First Department, Buchanan Capital Markets, LLC v. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 7:24 pm
Reaffirming - yet again - the advisory nature of the Guidelines in Nelson v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 10:37 pm
Huawei "merely" states that the UK court "can" take a Chinese FRAND determination with respect to the Chinese market, but "does not have to. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 2:52 pm
In a recent opinion, Hardeman County v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:15 pm
In the 1964 case New York Times v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:54 am
Supreme Court’s 2014 ruling in Halliburton v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
Hodges (Ohio), Tanco v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 7:43 am
Sharp v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 4:23 pm
On 3 June 2020 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in Serafin v Malkiewicz & Ors [2020] UKSC 23. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 7:35 am
The Fifth Circuit held in Asadi v. [read post]
